Fall Symposium
Abstract Deadline - Sunday, November 1
Abstract submissions will open October 1st
Poster Sessions, Wednesday, December 2
Sandhu Conference Center
Session 1: 9:30 AM - 11:00 AM
Session 2: 1:00 PM - 2:30 PM
Oral Sessions, Thursday, December 3
AF 209ABC
Session 1: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM
Session 2: 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Session 3: 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM
Chapman University understands the importance of undergraduate research and creative activity as fundamental to a student's academic journey. The Center of Undergraduate Excellence continuously strives to support and provide opportunities for undergraduates to thrive and expand their research knowledge and creative accomplishments. The Student Scholar Symposium celebrates the breadth and depth of scholarly research and creative exploration by Chapman University undergraduate students.
Experience a showcase of projects from diverse academic and creative disciplines. Interact with student researchers and their innovative presentations, reflecting rigorous inquiry across the campus.
Presentations are open to ALL disciplines.
Guidelines and Requirements
Participation and Important Dates
- Abstract submission deadline – TBA
- Poster printing deadline – TBA
Abstract Guidelines and Requirements
- Clearly state the project's central research question and/or purpose. Provide brief,
relevant scholarly or research context that demonstrates how the project contributes
to the area of inquiry. Provide a brief description of the research or creative methodology. State
expected results and/or conclusions. Include text only (no images or graphics). Be
well-written and well-organized.
- Abstracts should run 200-300 words with no paragraph breaks. Maximum length: 2100
characters (approximately 300 words).
- Use plain text format for your abstract. The form will not process some formatting
and special characters (e.g., scientific symbols). References are allowed but not
required.
- When submitting your abstract, have the following information:
-
- Name of Primary Author and Co-Author(s)
- Chapman e-mail address for each student and faculty mentor
- Field of study for each faculty mentor and student co-author
- Title and abstract
- AI Statement (see AI Policy dropdown)
-
-
GROUP PROJECTS - Designate one person from your group to submit the abstract. Only one abstract should be submitted for each project during the same poster session.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
Artificial intelligence policy for the Center for Undergraduate Excellence
This policy establishes expectations for the ethical, transparent, and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in all CUE-affiliated activities. This policy applies to both students and faculty when participating in any CUE-supported programming or applying to any CUE awards or fellowships. This document is intended to supplement existing university guidance on the use of AI in research/scholarship/creative activities and we encourage faculty and students to review the university AI guidelines in detail as well.
Guiding principles
Our AI policies are grounded in the following beliefs:
- Academic integrity and authenticity:All work presented at CUE events must represent the presenter’s own intellectual thought and work and should not be materially generated by AI. Similarly, any applications submitted to CUE must also represent the applicant’s own thinking and lived experiences.
- Transparency:As noted below, there are certain use cases where AI use is acceptable. In these scenarios, full transparency is expected. AI use should be disclosed when it materially shapes application or research outputs.
- Privacy and confidentiality:All students, faculty, and staff engaged in research that is supported by CUE must protect sensitive, personally identifiable, proprietary, or unpublished research information following Chapman’s guidelines on confidentiality and privacy.
- Accountability:Users are responsible for accuracy, citations, and compliance with all fellowship rules, mentor expectations, and university policies, and are ultimately responsible for anything they submit or share with a broader audience.
Acceptable and prohibited uses
For all CUE-sponsored applications and presentations, applicants are permitted to use AI tools as assistive support. This includes:
- Brainstorming topics, questions, or perspectives
- Outlining essays, proposals, and personal statements based on student/faculty-generated ideas
- Editing for clarity, grammar, tone, and conciseness
- Creating visual supplements for scholarly presentations and submissions
- Summarizing publicly available sources
Faculty and students are not allowed to use AI for the following:
- Generating or rewriting substantive text beyond minor copyediting
- Submitting or presenting any AI-generated text, images, or code as one’s own without disclosure when it materially contributes to the final work
- Fabricating experiences, awards, research results, citations, quotes, or references
- Using AI to impersonate another person
In short, AI can be used to support the brainstorming and revision process, but any work presented or submitted should represent the individual’s own intellectual thought.
Disclosure
Individuals must disclose AI use when it:
- Produces code used in analysis or results
- Creates figures/visuals included in final submissions
- Shapes research design, interpretation, or framing in meaningful ways
AI Statement
As part of all CUE applications that require student-produced documents, applicants will be asked how AI was used in developing the document(s). Applicants should be prepared to answer this question as part of the application. If AI was not used, indicate this in the response.
AI statement examples:
- “I used AI to suggest edits for clarity and concision on text I drafted. I reviewed and revised all outputs and take full responsibility for the final content.”
- “I used AI to brainstorm potential research questions and produce an initial outline. The final framing and all writing are my own.”
- “I used AI to generate initial code suggestions for [task]. I tested, modified, and verified the code and results.”
Failure to disclose AI use will be treated as a violation of Chapman’s academic integrity standards.
Fellowship application integrity and sponsor rules
CUE works with students across campus to promote applications to many external fellowships. Many of these fellowships have their own AI use policies, which may be stricter than the ones outlined here. Students applying to these fellowships are responsible for reviewing sponsor policies and must comply with the most restrictive requirements, ensuring that they meet all sponsor requirements. CUE will encourage students to check program rules regarding AI or outside assistance and provide guidance on ethical drafting and revision practices, but the ultimate responsibility for compliance with external fellowship policies rests with the student. If a fellowship sponsor prohibits AI use, students must not use AI in any part of that submission process (including brainstorming, drafting, or editing) unless the sponsor explicitly allows it.
AI disclosure statement: This policy was drafted with the help of generative AI to brainstorm ideas.
Poster Guidelines
Poster design can significantly enhance or severely diminish the effectiveness of your presentation. The guidelines are general considerations.
- Standard size: 48" x 36" landscape (template)
- Minimum font size - (32 pt)
- Preferred Font type - Arial or Helvetica
- Font Color - Black
- Need help designing your academic poster? View the video link for helpful poster design tips: Academic Poster Design Tutorial
Poster Printing Deadline - TBA, Print Here
